Startup Labs

Technical leadership

Technical Health Scorecard

A free technical health self-assessment for founders and operators. Get a directional score, risk areas and practical next steps without creating an account.

Free to useNo account requiredResults available without sharing an email

Answer based on the last 90 days. Your answers stay in this browser until you choose to share them.

Is one person accountable for technical direction?
01

Is one person accountable for technical direction?

Architecture, priorities, hiring and engineering quality have a clear owner.

Can you predict what will ship next month?
02

Can you predict what will ship next month?

Work is planned, progress is visible and missed commitments are understood.

Are production incidents rare and recoverable?
03

Are production incidents rare and recoverable?

You have monitoring, backups and a practiced path to restore service.

Can the team change the product without fear?
04

Can the team change the product without fear?

Tests and review practices catch regressions before customers do.

Could a new engineer contribute within two weeks?
05

Could a new engineer contribute within two weeks?

Setup, architecture and critical workflows are documented and current.

Do important operations still rely on spreadsheets or re-entry?
06

Do important operations still rely on spreadsheets or re-entry?

Manual work creates delays, errors or a scaling ceiling.

Does an outside vendor control critical knowledge or access?
07

Does an outside vendor control critical knowledge or access?

Your company owns its source, cloud accounts, credentials and deployment path.

Is the roadmap tied to measurable business priorities?
08

Is the roadmap tied to measurable business priorities?

Technical investments connect to customer, revenue or operational outcomes.

Guide

How to interpret a technical health score

These tools help you frame the decision. They are not a substitute for a technical review tailored to your company.

Talk with a CTO

A scorecard is a conversation starter, not an audit. It helps a founder or operating leader name the patterns that make delivery hard: unclear ownership, unreliable forecasting, recurring incidents, fragile changes or manual processes that limit growth.

Answer for the last 90 days, not for how the team hopes to operate. A strong answer should be supported by evidence such as incident records, deployment history, roadmap forecasts, test coverage for critical flows or clear ownership of production systems.

Do not treat the total score as a benchmark against other companies. Company stage and risk profile matter. A low score on reliability may need immediate action for a customer-facing SaaS business, while documentation gaps might be the most urgent issue during a team transition.

Use the gaps to choose a small number of next actions. Assign an owner, define what evidence would demonstrate improvement and set a review date. If the answers are unclear, start with discovery and system access review rather than committing to a rewrite.

Common questions

A few things to know.

Need a tailored answer?

Bring your situation to a technical leader.

We can help validate the assumptions, surface the risks and identify the next practical step.

No pitch decks. No obligations. Usually one working session.